Skip to content

When to use NoSQL vs. relational databases

When to Use NoSQL vs. Relational Databases

Choosing between NoSQL and relational databases (SQL) depends on several factors such as the nature of your data, scalability requirements, consistency needs, and the complexity of the queries. Here’s a guide to help determine when to use each type of database.

When to Use Relational Databases (SQL)

Relational databases are best suited for applications where:

  1. Structured Data with Defined Schema:
  2. Data follows a clear, predefined structure, with well-defined relationships (e.g., one-to-many, many-to-many).

  3. Tables, rows, and columns are appropriate for storing data (e.g., customers, orders, products in an e-commerce app).

  4. Complex Queries and Transactions:

  5. SQL databases are ideal for applications requiring complex queries such as joins, subqueries, and aggregations.
  6. They support ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) properties, making them suitable for applications where data consistency and correctness are critical.

  7. Use when you need strong transactional support, such as in banking systems, accounting software, or any system where data integrity and correctness are a priority.

  8. Data Integrity and Constraints:

  9. You need features like foreign key constraints, check constraints, and unique keys to enforce data integrity.

  10. Applications that need to maintain data consistency through relationships between entities (e.g., customers and orders) benefit from relational databases.

  11. Vertical Scaling (Single Server):

  12. When your workload can be handled by a single server or doesn’t require massive horizontal scaling, relational databases work well.

  13. They are often used when data size is relatively moderate and can be handled by a single machine.

  14. Mature Ecosystem and Standards:

  15. SQL databases have been around for decades, and their tools and ecosystem are well established.

  16. SQL (Structured Query Language) is standardized, and many developers are familiar with it, so training and using SQL tools is easier.

  17. Examples:

  18. PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, Oracle, Microsoft SQL Server.

When to Use NoSQL Databases

NoSQL databases are designed for scenarios where the limitations of traditional relational databases do not meet the needs of the application. Consider NoSQL when:

  1. Unstructured or Semi-Structured Data:
  2. The data does not fit neatly into a relational schema, and it can be semi-structured or unstructured (e.g., JSON, XML, key-value pairs).

  3. Examples include content management systems, logging systems, or systems where the data is flexible and changes frequently.

  4. Large-Scale, High-Velocity Data:

  5. Your system requires massive scalability, both horizontally (across multiple machines) and vertically (with large databases).
  6. NoSQL databases typically support high-throughput, high-velocity workloads, making them ideal for large-scale applications.

  7. Ideal for applications with large volumes of data that need to be distributed across multiple servers (e.g., IoT, real-time analytics).

  8. Schema Flexibility:

  9. NoSQL databases allow for dynamic schemas, which makes it easy to evolve the database structure without downtime or extensive migrations.

  10. When the data structure is fluid, such as in rapidly evolving startups, product catalogs, or real-time social media feeds, NoSQL is more suitable.

  11. High Availability and Fault Tolerance:

  12. NoSQL databases (especially those designed for distributed environments, like Cassandra, Couchbase, MongoDB) are optimized for availability and partition tolerance.
  13. They are often deployed in cloud environments with distributed architecture and are designed to automatically handle failover and recovery.

  14. Suitable for applications that cannot afford to go down or require 24/7 availability, even during network partitions (e.g., e-commerce platforms, social networks).

  15. Eventual Consistency:

  16. NoSQL systems are typically eventually consistent rather than strongly consistent, which allows them to handle high availability without sacrificing partition tolerance (i.e., the AP side of the CAP Theorem).

  17. Use NoSQL when the application can tolerate temporary inconsistencies but requires fast, continuous reads and writes.

  18. Simple Data Models:

  19. If your data model can be represented in key-value pairs, documents (JSON-like), wide-column stores, or graphs, NoSQL databases provide powerful models for these data types.

  20. For example:

    • Key-value stores (e.g., Redis, DynamoDB) are suitable for caching or storing session data.
    • Document stores (e.g., MongoDB, CouchDB) are suitable for storing JSON documents, such as user profiles or product catalogs.
    • Graph databases (e.g., Neo4j, Amazon Neptune) are designed to store and query highly connected data, like social networks.

  21. Scalable Reads and Writes:

  22. NoSQL databases excel in scenarios with high throughput, meaning they can efficiently handle many read and write requests at once.

  23. Particularly suited for large-scale, distributed applications that need to handle large amounts of concurrent users (e.g., social media apps, data streaming services).

  24. Examples:

  25. MongoDB (document-based), Cassandra (wide-column), Redis (key-value), Couchbase (document-based), Neo4j (graph-based), DynamoDB (key-value/document-based).

Key Considerations for Choosing Between NoSQL and Relational Databases

  1. Data Structure:
  2. Relational: Structured data with clear relationships.

  3. NoSQL: Unstructured, semi-structured, or flexible data.

  4. Scalability:

  5. Relational: Vertical scaling (scale up with more powerful servers).

  6. NoSQL: Horizontal scaling (scale out with more servers).

  7. Transactions:

  8. Relational: ACID compliance for transactional consistency.

  9. NoSQL: Limited ACID properties (eventual consistency is often used).

  10. Consistency vs. Availability:

  11. Relational: Strong consistency and well-defined ACID transactions.

  12. NoSQL: More likely to favor availability and partition tolerance (AP of CAP theorem), with eventual consistency.

  13. Query Complexity:

  14. Relational: Supports complex joins, aggregations, and SQL queries.

  15. NoSQL: Less complex queries, often using specialized query languages (e.g., MongoDB’s query language, Cassandra's CQL).

  16. Flexibility:

  17. Relational: Fixed schema, which requires migrations for schema changes.

  18. NoSQL: Flexible schema that allows easy changes without requiring migrations.

  19. Use Case:

  20. Relational: Financial systems, CRM systems, ERP systems, and any system with strong data integrity needs.
  21. NoSQL: Real-time analytics, content management, large-scale web applications, social networks, IoT, and any system that requires horizontal scaling.

When to Combine Both

In some applications, using both SQL and NoSQL can be beneficial. For example: - SQL for transactional integrity: Use a relational database for parts of your application requiring strict consistency, like order processing or user authentication. - NoSQL for scalability and flexibility: Use NoSQL for other parts of your application, like user-generated content, logs, or analytics.

This polyglot persistence approach allows you to leverage the strengths of both types of databases depending on the part of the application.

Conclusion

  • Use relational databases when you need strict data integrity, complex queries, and well-defined relationships between data.
  • Use NoSQL databases when you require flexibility, scalability, high availability, and can tolerate eventual consistency for large-scale, distributed applications.